UPDATE:
The second comment on this post was made anonymously, asking "Who cares?" . It was posted by someone posting from a News Limited network.
Also, Luke Royes, the apparent City News reporter whose tweets I have linked to in the post below, has now made his Twitter account private. He may not be aware that
Twitter Search will continue to display the tweets he made before he locked the account down.
Since Twitter Search only lasts for a couple of weeks,
click here to see a screenshot I just took of the Twitter search screen, showing the tweets that Luke Royes posted that I quote further down in the article.
Next!
END UPDATE
Rupert Murdoch, the chairman and managing director of
News Corporation, is angry at companies who make it easy to find his content on the Internet. Last year,
in a speech at the World Media Conference, he called them "content kleptomaniacs":
The Philistine phase of the digital age is almost over. The aggregators and the plagiarists will soon have to pay a price for the co-opting of our content. But if we do not take advantage of the current movement toward paid-for content, it will be the content creators, the people in this hall, who will pay the ultimate price and the content kleptomaniacs will triumph.
However, it seems when it comes to
his papers, taking the content of Twitter users and publishing it without saying who its from is perfectly OK. Yesterday, February 11 2009,
Twitter user Erik Veland posted a message about a post from
Twitter user Sarah Fallon (who uses the nickname @beautiful_alone). Erik Veland's post said:
There's been a rash of uncredited tweets in the news lately. Here's @'s from last week in City News
This is a screenshot taken by Erik Veland of what the City News published:
Click here to see the original message posted by Fallon on Thursday February 4th. As you can see, the City News didn't bother to credit Fallon by name, calling her a "Twitter fanatic", which she objects to:
Thanks City News for printing my tweet without crediting me: http://yfrog.com/4emxqcj (via @erikveland). Hmpf. 'twitter fanatic' my arse.
The Brisbane City News is part of
Quest Community Newspapers, which is
owned by
News Limited, News Corporation's Australian arm.
Naturally, when the City News was alerted to this failure to attribute the author of the tweet they republished, they immediately apologised and offered to make restitution to Fallon. Oh wait, sorry, this
isn't Bizzaro World. In fact, both responses to Fallon were a joke. First of all Twitter user
Luke Royes, who appears to be a reporter for the City News (
a story under his byline appeared in yesterday's City News here)
replied to both Erik Veland and Sarah Fallon:
@ErikVeland @beautiful_alone Thanks for reading @BrisCityNews tell all your friends to pick up a copy each Thursday!
(Mr Royes got the name of his own newspapers's Twitter account wrong, it's actually
@CityNewsBrisbane).
It's
unclear if this later tweet posted by Mr Royes is a threat relating to Ms Fallon's complaints about the Brisbane City News' failure to attribute the source of their story:
Not sure if there has been a previously proven case, but defamation on Twitter is possible. Clearly some forget that.
Ms Fallon also received an email in reply to a complaint she sent to the City News:
Clearly News Limited policy does not currently state that the authors of material quoted in full in their newspapers should be credited or paid.
Sure, it's a storm in a teacup. There are a hundred stories more important than this one. But just remember that the next time you hear Mr Murdoch complaining about content being stolen, that he's perched at the top of an organisation who doesn't respect the work of others.